Prolife 23 June 2014:
1) About genome sequencing [mapping DNA] of living human babies developing in womb with quotes:
"Sequencing DNA has become so cheap and easy that its routine use in pregnancy, as a way to get a broad view of a fetus’s health, is starting to look inevitable. “In five years we will be offering [genome] sequencing for all routine pregnancies in the first trimester,” predicts Art Beaudet, chairman of molecular genetics at Baylor College of Medicine. He says Baylor is developing plans to begin offering so-called exome sequencing, or decoding of the key parts of the genome, during pregnancy for some couples.
What’s still not settled is the ethics of prenatal sequencing—or the question of who gets to control the data. In fact, that debate has barely begun. It’s such a new idea that the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, which sets guidelines for medical geneticists, still has no position on it, says Diana Bianchi, executive director of the Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts University."
Read : http://www.technologyreview.com/news/527936/for-one-baby-life-begins-with-genome-revealed
2) Prolife of UK has taken case to court to stop hosptials from labeling humans as 'do not resuscitate" without patient requesting that or discusson with family members if patient is comatose. Quote:
"It is frighteningly easy for a doctor to decide unilaterally not simply that a treatment is non-beneficial but that a patient's life is not worth saving. When there is so much advertising of death by pro-euthanasia and pro-suicide activists, this is truly dangerous." - See more at: http://prolife.org.uk/2014/06/patient-labelled-resuscitate/...
Both of these cases are similar because both are examples of government run amok, and of "research" in the name of medicine that has huge potential to eradicate the human race. Think about it. If every pregnant woman around the world had the decision to analyze 6 billion cells in an unborn child to supposedly determine if that child would ever have any diseases in the lifetime, how much stress would that cause pregnant women AND how much pressure would be put on women to abort their babies? And in the second scenario, it is similar because a written "do not resuscitate " order by a medical doctor essentially means that NO life-saving measures wold be implemented, thus giving the doctor control over who lives and who dies. Should medical doctors anywhere have that power? NO! They should not.
Read the book, The Nazi Doctors written by Robert J Lifton, MD [who is still a medical doctor in the U S] about how medical doctors were used by Hitler to write the orders to gas to death the Jews . And how the families were lied too and tricked by vague words as to what the "treatment" was [death was the result] ; and compare it to the present situation in US where the federal government has totally taken over every facet of health care deliverey with thousands of pages of political rules about who gets care and who doesn't , and what level of "care" they get [death via with-holding of care which is called "passive euthanasia" for some such handicapped, elderly which Obama defines as age 50 or older; and deliberate murder for some such as some in the womb via abortion paid for with taxpayer dollars] but limousine care for those in Congress .
These are medical issues which every person should be aware of, and which every person should oppose in order to cultivate a climate conducive to human life.
I am not copyrighting this post so it may be quoted as long as sources including mine, are attributed. The art I created and posted to this blog and also my poem "Real women have babies" is copyrighted content however. Copyright notice: this blog and the art, photos, original poems and original words of mine [Gloria Poole, RN, artist of Missouri who was born in state of Georgia] are copyrighted and may not be transferred to anyone, anywhere, nor have domains forwarded to it that are not my domains, nor be saved to disk, nor be copied, nor photocopied, nor printed at remote. This blog and its content belongs exclusively to me Gloria Poole and I am a Registered Nurse licensed in Missouri and an artist in all mediums, and a white, Christian, woman, and mother of two grown daughters who are Jennifer and Leigh; and a republican, prolife blogger, photographer, citizen journo, and author, poet. For the record I am also a single again [divorced twice] woman and I resumed my maiden name including my surname of Poole after both divorces. My 2 daughters [no sons] were born to me in my first marriage, and my second marriage lasted only 4 years, and final decree of divorce from male DBP was in Oct 2007 in Arapahoe County Colorado and is public record.
You may read more about me and see more of the art I create on these other blogs of mine
https://gloriapoole.blogspot.com
https://mini-exhibition.blogspot.com
https://artist-gloriapoole.blogspot.com
http://gloriapoole.wordpress.com
http://gloriapoole1749.wordpress.com
http;//gloriapoole.livejournal.com
http://gloriapoole-UK.livejournal.com
https://gloria0817.blogspot.com
https://gpoole817.blogspot.com
https://real-women-have-babies.blogspot.com
https://save-the-baby-humans.blogspot.com
https://tapestry-of-life-llp.blogspot.com
https://words-that-work-llp.blogspot.com
https://publishing-life.blogspot.com
https://news-for-life.blogspot.com
https://sites.google.com/site/ArtistIllustrations [human development sketches I drew in pencil]
You may follow me on twitter on any or all of these [if you are not trying to murder me]:
@gloriapoole; @ProlifeNurse; @gloria_poole; @Tartan_Bliss; @personhood1; @tweetie0817.
Gloria Poole, RN, artist / Gloria Poole / Gloria / gloriapoole / gloria-poole / gloria.poole / artist-gloriapoole / Ms Gloria Poole / Poole.Gloria / gloriapooleRN at yahoo, and other variations of my real, born with name of Gloria Poole, at my own private, not shared apt in Missouri, 23 June 2014 at 3:51pm
